Objective 1:
Absolute vs.
relative dating (1c)
Objective 2:
Continental
drift (2a)
Intermittent
land bridges (2d)
Did
cracking continent trigger a deep freeze?: The break-up of a
supercontinent may have caused a 'Snowball Earth'. (optional)
Extinction of the North American large mammals: Who or what killed them off? (optional)
Objective 3:
Conditions
necessary for species dispersal (3a/c)
The Law of the
Minimum and the Law of Tolerance (3b)
Objective 5:
Convergent
evolution (5c)
Confused by evolutionary trees? Check out Understanding
Evolution.
Objective 7:
"Evolution in the Everyday World" from Scientific American (optional; see Blackboard for link)
Objective 8:
Primates (8a)
Hominoid divergence
(8d)
A
recent split of humans and chimps? (optional) (New!)
Unique
characteristics of primates (optional)
Earliest "human footprints" found (optional)
Objective 9:
Characteristics
that differ between apes and humans (9b)
Peking man older than previously thought! (optional)
"The Human Pedigree" from Scientific American (optional; see Blackboard for link)
Objective 12:
Latitudinal
trends in species diversity (12f)
Life
is faster in the temperate zones (optional) (New!)
Objective 13:
Go to Blackboard to access the "Rapid
Climate Change" article (courtesy of American
Scientist)
More on rapid
global warming (optional)
North American tree deaths accelerate (optional)
Ice bridge ruptures in Antarctic (optional)
Objective 14:
Lake
turnover (download a .pdf file)
More
lake turnover
What
is a mesotrophic lake? (14b)
Beebe
Lake
Objective 15:
More
on biomes
Biomes
slideshow
|
Primate Characteristics Suggest Arboreal
Ancestry
Fossil evidence indicates that the primates arose very early in
the Cenozoic from
a stock of small, tree-dwelling insectivores not unlike the living tree
shrews (order Scandentia: family Tupaiida). The group soon split into several
evolutionary lineages that have likely had independent histories since.
|
A tree shrew, thought to resemble the common ancestor
of all primates. They are not closely related to squirrels, which they
resemble superficially. |
Although living primates are a diverse group, most share the following
characteristics:
- enlargement of the clavicle (reduced or absent in many other mammals)
- a highly mobile shoulder joint and an elbow joint allowing some degree
of rotation
- retention of five functional digits on each limb
- enhanced individual mobility of the digits, especially the thumb and
big toe, which are often opposable
- modification of claws into flattened nails
- development of sensitive tactile pads on the digits
- shortening of the snout
- three-dimensional (stereoscopic) vision
- enhanced visual acuity and color vision
- enlargement of the brain, particularly the cerebral cortex
- usually only two mammary glands and one young per pregnancy
Many of these traits are adaptations for an arboreal lifestyle. Among ground-dwelling
mammals the limbs have tended to evolve enhanced stability and reduced range
of motion. In contrast, tree-dwelling mammals, especially those that move via
vertical clinging and leaping or brachiation (swinging by the forelimbs), need
very mobile limbs and often position limbs at the sides of the body (rather
than underneath it) to maximize their reach. Grasping hands and feet and dextrous,
sensitive digits are also adaptive for an arboreal existence.
The position of the eyes also differs between ground-dwelling and arboreal
mammals. Many terrestrial quadrupeds have eyes positioned at the sides
of the head, giving them a very wide visual field, but having very little overlap
in the fields of the two eyes. This arrangement allows a terrestrial animal
to see predators (for example) even if they are almost directly behind the
animal, but gives the animal relatively poor depth perception. Primates tend
to have their eyes positioned relatively close together on the front of the
head, reducing their visual field, but giving them excellent stereoscopic vision
and depth perception. This is, of course, important in localizing objects and
an animal jumping from limb to limb obviously must be able to detect the position
of the next limb with considerable accuracy.
A comparison of primate hands. Primate hands
vary in their structure and manipulative ability. The hand of the tarsier has
an opposable thumb and slender fingers with adhesive pads adapted for grasping
branches. The hands of organutans are adapted for swinging from branch to branch;
the fingers serve mainly as hooks for hanging on branches and the thumb is
short so as not to get in the way. The hand of the gorilla has a longer, more
opposable thumb than the orangutan, and the fingers are shorter. the human
hand has the most manipulative ability; the long thumb is more opposable and
the fingers more dextrous and capable of free movements.
The Prosimians were the First Primates
The living primates are usually classified into suborders: The
Prosimii (prosimians - including lemurs and lorises) and the Anthropidea (anthropoids
- monkeys, apes, and humans). The name prosimian means "pre-monkey" and
this group of primates are thought to have been the first primates to evolve
from
the groups insectivore ancestors. In general, prosimians have a mix of "typical"
primate characteristics and traits more similar to those of ancestral insectivores.
For example, prosimians have opposable first digits, but have longer snouts
and long bushy tails - traits not seen in anthropoid primates.
Many Anatomical Differences Separate Apes from Humans
Some of the many anatomical changes that occurred in the course
of evolution from an ape-like ancestor to modern humans are:
- the jaw became shorter and more arc-shaped (rather than U-shaped as in
apes) (see A below), and the teeth became smaller.
- the point of attachment of the skull to the vertebral column shifted
from the rear of the braincase to a position under the braincase (see C
below), which balances the skull more on top of the vertebral column; permitting
a more
upright, vertical posture.
- the braincase became much larger relative to body size and, as it did,
a prominent vertical forehead developed.
- crests and ridges on the skull, such as eyebrow ridges, were reduced
as the muscles that attached to them became smaller (see B below).
- the nose became more prominent, with a distinct bridge and tip.
- the arms (though probably never as long as in modern apes) became shorter,
and the legs became longer relative to the arms.
- the posture became uproght and bipedal, which required a change in the
curvature of the vertebral column (becoming more S-shaped), as well as
modifications in the shape of the pelvis and positioning of the legs.
- the feet became flattened for bipedal walking and then an arch developed.
- the big toes moved back into line with the other toes and ceased to be
opposable (see D below).

|