| Unit 8: Demos |
|
Absolute vs. relative dating (1c) Continental
drift (2a) Conditions
necessary for species dispersal (3 a and b) Convergent
evolution (6c) "Evolution in the Everyday World" from Scientific American (optional; see Blackboard for link) Primates (9a) Characteristics
that differ between apes and humans (10b) Latitudinal
trends in species diversity (13e) Lake
turnover (download a .pdf file) |
Absolute and Relative Dating Methods Absolute vs. Relative Dating Absolute dating methods allow a researcher to determine the age of a sample in years whereas relative dating methods only allow scientists to determine that a given sample is older or younger than a reference sample. For example, using an absolute dating method, like radiometric dating described below, you could determine that a tooth from the La Brea Tar Pits is 11,050 years old. A relative dating method, like comparing fossil sequences in sedimentary rocks from around the world, will only able to conclude that a sample is older than a particular layer of rock or another sample. Naturally occurring isotopes such as radioactive carbon (14C) make possible the dating of many rocks and fossils. The ratio of the radioactive isotope 14C to the stable 12C, for instance, is relatively constant in the carbon dioxide of the atmosphere, but once a plant has captured a CO2 molecule and built it into a product like sucrose or cellulose, the decay of 14C atoms to 12C causes a ratio of 14C to 12C to decline steadily with time. The older the sample, the lower the amount of 14C and the higher the amount of 12C. Hence, the 14C:12C ratio in a sample provides a moderately accurate measure of age. Supplementary Link: |
|
|